DD
Jag har redan kommenterat angående saker och tings giltighet, om du verkligen läste mina inlägg kanske vi skulle slippa tala förbi varandra.
Nåväl, vi återgår till huvudfrågan. Den gränslösa Guden är inget problem. Det problematiska och absurda vore ju att man skulle kunna förklara det gudomliga. Som bekant så är ju det gudomliga inte något som vetenskapsmän sysselsätter sig med att studera.
Att allting kan förklaras är en tro (positivism) och en mycket vacklande sådan. Den moderna vetsnekapen har idag övergett den och idag talar man istället om Falsifikationismen (Popper).
Problemet med den gränslösa guden
Moderator: Moderatorgruppen
Ska bara klippa in ett citat av Meister Eckhart om hans syn på gud eftersom jag tyckte det passade in i sammanhanget.
"God is nameless, for no man can either say or understand aught about Him. If I say, God is good, it is not true; nay more; I am good, God is not good. I may even say, I am better than God; for whatever is good, may become better, and whatever may become better, may become best. Now God is not good, for He cannot become better. And if He cannot become better, He cannot become best, for these three things, good, better, and best, are far from God, since He is above all. If I also say, God is wise, it is not true; I am wiser than He. If I also say, God is a Being, it is not true; He is transcendent Being and superessential Nothingness. Concerning this St Augustine says: the best thing that man can say about God is to be able to be silent about Him, from the wisdom of his inner judgement. Therefore be silent and prate not about God, for whenever thou dost prate about God, thou liest, and committest sin. If thou wilt be without sin, prate not about God. Thou canst understand nought about God, for He is above all understanding.
A master saith: If I had a God whom I could understand, I would never hold Him to be God."
"God is nameless, for no man can either say or understand aught about Him. If I say, God is good, it is not true; nay more; I am good, God is not good. I may even say, I am better than God; for whatever is good, may become better, and whatever may become better, may become best. Now God is not good, for He cannot become better. And if He cannot become better, He cannot become best, for these three things, good, better, and best, are far from God, since He is above all. If I also say, God is wise, it is not true; I am wiser than He. If I also say, God is a Being, it is not true; He is transcendent Being and superessential Nothingness. Concerning this St Augustine says: the best thing that man can say about God is to be able to be silent about Him, from the wisdom of his inner judgement. Therefore be silent and prate not about God, for whenever thou dost prate about God, thou liest, and committest sin. If thou wilt be without sin, prate not about God. Thou canst understand nought about God, for He is above all understanding.
A master saith: If I had a God whom I could understand, I would never hold Him to be God."
Återgå till "Religion och andlighet"
Vilka är online
Användare som besöker denna kategori: 11 och 0 gäster